Sustainability of Electric Vehicles

Ethical opinion form for Faculty of Business and Law (BAL) taught undergraduate and postgraduate students (except MRes)
Instructions to student
The questions starting on the next page of this form should be completed by the student on relevant dissertation / project units requiring the completion of an ethics form, regardless of whether you are collecting primary or secondary data. Refer to the Guidance Notes that accompany this form and the ‘Research ethics – issues to consider’ checklist, also to be found as an appendix to the Guidance Notes, for help in completing the form. If you are not collecting primary data or data that are identifiable with individuals, then you still need to complete an ethics form, but only need to answer Qs 1-4, then Q11 and as many of the questions between Qs 12-20 as are relevant in your case. The completed form, and any supporting documentation you intend to issue to participants, should then be passed to the supervisor. If your supervisor is satisfied that your application is capable of review, the usual procedure is that he / she will send it to an appointed independent reviewer to decide whether ethical approval can be supported. The reviewer, in conjunction with the supervisor, is responsible for approving the ethical dimension of your project, although you may be asked to amend your documentation to the satisfaction of the reviewer before a favourable ethical opinion can be granted.
No data collection or recruitment of potential participants must be undertaken before a final version of this form has been approved.
A favourable ethical opinion means that, as long as you conduct the study in the way that has been agreed, then you have ethical approval. If you subsequently do something other than what has already been agreed, then you no longer have ethical approval and would face the appropriate penalty. If you need to apply for subsequent changes to your project after having been given initial ethical approval, please fill in an ‘Amendment’ at the end of this form and reapply via your supervisor.
If, following the completion of the review process, your supervisor and, where relevant, any independent reviewer is unwilling to grant you a favourable ethical opinion, you have a right of appeal to BAL Faculty Ethics Committee. If you wish to exercise this right, your supervisor should email the Faculty Ethics Administrator, stating your name, HEMIS no., the relevant unit and course, and briefly stating the grounds for requesting that BAL Faculty Ethics Committee review the decision. Your supervisor should attach your completed ethics form and any supplementary documentation and include any relevant correspondence about the case.
A final signed and dated version of this form must be included in the file of the dissertation you are required to submit electronically. The form MUST be signed and dated by 1) the student, 2) the supervisor and 3) the peer ethics reviewer (unless the University has specifically previously agreed that the supervisor alone can sign off). If the dissertation is submitted without a fully completed, signed and dated ethics form it will be deemed to be a fail. Second attempt assessment may be permitted by the Board of Examiners.

1. What are the objectives of the dissertation / research project?

The main objective this dissertation seeks to answer is the sustainability of EV electic vehicles in regards to the source of energy, greenhouse emissions. I will also investigate the lifecycle of raw materials from three aspects which are the economic, environmental and social aspects. The research will include secondary data only.

Literature review will include 3 sections
1- sustainability and its consequences on human life
2- the rise of electic vehicles
3- sustainability of electric vehicles
For the methodology I will assess 3 methods which include
1- LCA is combined with strategic sustainability development framework to provide a full assessment of sustainability in specific scenarios. (objective – to identify sustainability principle violations at each period. This method is selected in the first method because it helps identify main obstacles facing the automotive sector.
2- Method two uses data that’s indirect from publish articles
3- Method 3 combines secondary data and scenarios concerning indirect pollutant emissions

2. Does the research involve NHS patients, resources or staff? YES / NO (please delete as applicable).
If YES, it is likely that full ethical review must be obtained from the NHS process before the research can start. Please discuss your proposal with your Supervisor and/or Course Leader and consult the Guidance Notes for this ethics form.

3. Does the research involve MoD staff? YES / NO (please delete as applicable).
If YES, then ethical review may need to be undertaken by MoD REC. Please discuss your proposal with your Supervisor and/or Course Leader and consult the Guidance Notes for this ethics form.

4. Do you intend to collect primary data from human subjects or data that are identifiable with individuals? (This includes, for example, questionnaires and interviews.) YES / NO (please delete as applicable)
If you do not intend to collect such primary data then please go to question 11.
If you do intend to collect such primary data then please respond to ALL the questions from Q5 onwards. If you feel a question does not apply then please respond with ‘n/a’ (for ‘not applicable’).

5. How will the primary data contribute to the objectives of the dissertation / research project?
n/a’

6. What is/are the survey population(s)?
n/a’

7. a) How big is the sample for each of the survey populations, and b) how was this sample arrived at? (Please answer both parts of this question.) n/a’

8. How will respondents be a) identified and b) recruited? (Please answer both parts of this question.)
n/a’

9. What steps are proposed to ensure that the requirements of informed consent will be met for those taking part in the research? If an Information Sheet for participants is to be used, please attach it to this form. If not, please explain how you will be able to demonstrate that informed consent has been gained from participants.

n/a’
10. How will data be collected from each of the sample groups?

n/a’
11. a) How will data be stored and b) what will happen to the data at the end of the research? (Please answer both parts of this question.)

Data will be stored on my personal google drive account and university account it will also be uploaded to university drive. After finishing the assignment data will be kept for a period of 10 days on the google drive in line with Portsmouth university data retention policy.
12. What measures will be taken to prevent unauthorized persons gaining access to the data, and especially to data that may be attributed to identifiable individuals?
All information will be stored on my personal laptop and google drive account which I protected by a password and I get an email ounce a new device logged my account.

13. What steps are proposed to safeguard the anonymity of the respondents?
All data will be secondary data and information will only include the sustainability of electic vehicles. No individuals will be included in the report

14. Are there any risks (physical or other, including reputational) to respondents that may result from taking part in this research? YES / NO (please delete as applicable).
If YES, please specify and state what measures are proposed to deal with these risks.

15. Are there any risks (physical or other, including reputational) to the researcher or to the University that may result from conducting this research? YES / NO (please delete as applicable).
If YES, please specify and state what measures are proposed to manage these risks.

16. Will any data be obtained from a company or other organisation? YES / NO (please delete as applicable) For example, information provided by an employer or its employees.

17. What steps are proposed to ensure that the requirements of informed consent will be met for any organisation in which data will be gathered? How will confidentiality be assured for the organisation?
n/a

18. Does the organisation have its own ethics procedure relating to the research you intend to carry out? YES / NO (please delete as applicable).
If YES, the University will require written evidence from the organisation that they have approved the research.

19. Will the proposed research involve any of the following (please put a √ next to ‘yes’ or ‘no’; consult your supervisor if you are unsure):

• Potentially vulnerable groups (e.g. adults unable to consent, children)? YES NO

• Particularly sensitive topics? YES NO

• Access to respondents via ‘gatekeepers’? YES NO

• Use of deception? YES NO

• Access to confidential personal data (names, addresses, etc)? YES NO

• Psychological stress, anxiety, etc.? YES NO

• Intrusive interventions? YES NO

If answers to any of the above are “YES”, please explain below how you intend to minimise the associated risks.

20. Are there any other ethical issues that may arise from the proposed research?

No

Print name Signature Date signed
Student Juman al Mughrabi JNM 12-12-2020
I / we grant a favourable ethical opinion:
Supervisor
Peer reviewer (unless University has agreed that supervisor can sign off)

AMENDMENTS
If you need to make changes, please ensure you have permission before recruiting any participants and any primary data collection. If there are major changes, fill in a new form if that will make it easier for everyone. If there are minor changes then fill in the amendments (next page) and get them signed before the primary data collection begins.

CHANGES TO ETHICS PERMISSION

VERSION: ____
Please describe the nature of the change and impact on ethics:

Print name Signature Date signed
Student
I / we grant a favourable ethical opinion:
Supervisor
Peer reviewer (unless University has agreed that supervisor can sign off)

(please cut and paste the next section, together with the heading at the top of this page, as many times as required)
VERSION: ____
Please describe the nature of the change and impact on ethics:

Print name Signature Date signed
Student
I / we grant a favourable ethical opinion:
Supervisor
Peer reviewer (unless University has agreed that supervisor can sign off)